Skip to main content

verdicts

Case:
Gail & Andrew Luchey v Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
The Cardenas Law Group, LLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Gail & Andrew Luchey v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiffs filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the commercial insurance contract by denying coverage for their claim for damage to their quadruplex resulting from Hurricane Irma. Following the depositions of the Plaintiffs and their public adjuster, during which Mr. Perez secured favorable testimony, and in advance of an approaching trial, Plaintiffs dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
The Kidwell Group, LLC d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida a/a/o Lynda Masters v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
The Florida Insurance Law Group, LLC
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal in the matter styled The Kidwell Group, LLC d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida a/a/o Lynda Masters v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the commercial insurance contract by denying coverage for its claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured triplex pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, and its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, contending that Plaintiff’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations, as the assignment was executed more than three years after Hurricane Irma. Defendant relied on Florida Statute §627.70132, which requires notice of a hurricane claim be provided within three years of the date of loss. Just before the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
The Kidwell Group, LLC d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida a/a/o Saksams Investments, Inc. v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
The Florida Insurance Law Group, LLC
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal in the matter styled The Kidwell Group, LLC d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida a/a/o Saksams Investments, Inc. v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit pursuant to an assignment of benefits alleging that Defendant breached the commercial insurance contract by denying coverage for its claim for payment for an engineering report concerning damage to a shopping center from a tornado. Defendant filed its Motion for Final Summary Judgment, and its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, contending that the preparation of an engineering report did not constitute a direct physical loss covered by the commercial wind-only policy, and that Plaintiff’s purported assignment agreement failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, and was therefore invalid and unenforceable, rendering Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. Minutes before the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Plaintiff then reimbursed Defendant for the attorneys’ fees and costs incurred defending Plaintiff’s frivolous claims, pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105. Read More.
Case:
Quality Assessments & Logistics, LLC a/a/o Eduardo Vazquez v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Jimenez & Carrillo, LLC
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal in the matter styled Quality Assessments & Logistics, LLC a/a/o Eduardo Vazquez v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus rendered Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. Defendant’s motion was granted, as the purported assignment agreement did not contain the requisite written, itemized, per-unit cost estimate of the services to be performed by the assignee. Read More.
Case:
Pavel Figueredo v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
The Property Advocates, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Pavel Figueredo v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from a kitchen leak, and then subsequently sold the property. Defendant filed its Motion for Final Summary Judgment, asserting that there was neither any evidence of out of pocket expenses incurred for repairs related to the claimed damage, nor any credits or other impact on the sale of the property related to the claimed damage, thus no evidence of any compensable damages, an essential element of a claim for breach of contract. Following the deposition of the insured, during which Mr. Teijelo secured favorable testimony in support of Defendant’s position, and upon receipt of Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
Jose Fabregas & Luz Montenegro v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
MSPG Law Group, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Jose Fabregas & Luz Montenegro v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiffs filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for their claim for damage to their property resulting from a kitchen leak. Following the deposition of the insured, during which Mr. Teijelo secured favorable testimony in support of Defendant’s position, Defendant filed its Motion for Final Summary Judgment, arguing that the damage was the result of constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water and therefore excluded form coverage under the policy. Just minutes before the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
Jacqueline Varela v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Duboff Law Firm
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Jacqueline Varela v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for her claim for damage to her property resulting from a kitchen leak. Following the deposition of the insured, during which Mr. Teijelo secured favorable testimony in support of Defendant’s position, Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that the damage was the result of constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water and therefore excluded form coverage under the policy. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
AFCAM Group Corp d/b/a AFCAM Restoration a/a/o Jacqueline Varela v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Law Offices of Marcote & Marcote De Moya, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled AFCAM Group Corp d/b/a AFCAM Restoration a/a/o Jacqueline Varela v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, thus rendering Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. Defendant’s motion was granted, as the purported assignment agreement did not contain the necessary rescission language. Read More.
Case:
JNE Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Moldone Experts a/a/o Jacqueline Varela v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Peregonza The Attorneys, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled JNE Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Moldone Experts a/a/o Jacqueline Varela v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage of Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to a mold assessment conducted at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Final Summary Judgment, arguing that the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor, that the assignor’s loss was the result of constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water and therefore excluded form coverage under the policy, and that the mold assessment conducted by Plaintiff would only be covered if the costs were a result of a covered peril. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
Carolina & Abraham Anzardo v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Grande Law, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Carolina & Abraham Anzardo v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiffs filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for their claim for damage to their property resulting from a roof leak. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that the damage to the roof pre-existed the claimed date of loss, and there was no evidence of a wind created opening in the roof that allowed rainwater to enter the property. Upon receipt of Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
Water Tech Restoration, LLC a/a/o Olga Mederos v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Levy & Partners, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Water Tech Restoration, LLC a/a/o Olga Mederos v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus rendered Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. Defendant’s motion was granted, without prejudice, as the purported assignment agreement did not contain the requisite written, itemized, per-unit cost estimate of the services to be performed by the assignee. Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint, attempting to cure the deficiency. Defendant filed its second motion to dismiss, again challenging the validity of the purported assignment, and Plaintiff’s standing to file suit. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s second motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
South Florida Restoration Service, LLC a/a/o Barbara Cabanas v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Velasquez & Associates, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled South Florida Restoration Service, LLC a/a/o Barbara Cabanas v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus rendered Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. Defendant’s motion was granted, without prejudice, as the purported assignment agreement did not contain the necessary language, or the requisite written, itemized, per-unit cost estimate of the services to be performed by the assignee. Plaintiff then filed an amended complaint, attempting to cure the deficiencies. Defendant filed its second motion to dismiss, contending that Plaintiff’s purported assignment agreement still failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, and was therefore invalid and unenforceable. Just hours before the hearing on Defendant’s second motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
Orlando Water Mitigation, LLC a/a/o Nino Garboza & Annamora Vargas v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Louis Law Group, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Taylor Montanari, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Orlando Water Mitigation, LLC a/a/o Nino Garboza & Annamora Vargas v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus rendered Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case with prejudice. Read More.
Case:
The Kidwell Group, LLC d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida a/a/o Chamile Rosa. V. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Krapf Legal, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Taylor Montanari, Esq., secured a dismissal in the matter styled The Kidwell Group, LLC d/b/a Air Quality Assessors of Florida a/a/o Chamile Rosa v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit pursuant to an assignment of benefits alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for its claim for payment for the preparation of an engineering report. Defendant filed its Motion for Final Summary Judgment, contending that the preparation of an engineering report was not covered by the policy, and that Plaintiff’s purported assignment agreement failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus rendered Plaintiff without standing to maintain the lawsuit. Plaintiff dismissed the case, and reimbursed Defendant for the costs incurred defending the case. Read More.
Case:
Imperial Lakes Group, LLC et al v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Tabares Law, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Imperial Lakes Group, et al v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for its claim for damage to its property resulting from Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that Plaintiff lacked the requisite insurable interest at the time of loss. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Stephen Woodson v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Feldman & Lopez, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Stephen Woodson v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim resulting from a plumbing leak. Following the deposition of the insured, during which Mr. Teijelo secured favorable testimony in support of Defendant’s position that the damage at issue was pre-existing, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Jose M. Hernandez, et al v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
The Pardo Law Firm, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Jose M. Hernandez, et al v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from Tropical Storm Eta. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, based on the policy’s exclusion for damage cause by wear and tear, and the lack of any evidence of a peril created opening in the roof that allowed rain water to enter the property. On the eve of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Liberty Extraction & Drying, LLC a/a/o Ana Chavarria v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Property Litigation Group
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Associate Marie Macias secured a dismissal in the matter styled Liberty Extraction & Drying, LLC a/a/o Ana Chavarria v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant served Plaintiff with its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, arguing that the loss, an alleged plumbing leak, was not a covered cause of loss specifically enumerated in the named perils insurance policy, and thus, Plaintiff’s claim was frivolous in nature. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Paramount Property Restoration Corp a/a/o Katiuska Hernandez v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
The Pardo Law Firm, P.A.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Associate Marie Macias obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Paramount Property restoration Corp a/a/o Katiuska Hernandez v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by not paying the full amount of Plaintiff’s invoice for services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that it had properly issued payment pursuant to the statutory limit. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
AAA Restoration, LLC a/a/o Wilfredo Perez v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Associate Taylor Montanari secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled AAA Restoration, LLC v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for its claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits executed more than three years after Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, and served its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, contending that Plaintiff’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant relied on Florida Statute §627.70132, which requires notice of a hurricane claim be provided within three years of the date of loss. As Plaintiff’s purported assignment was executed outside of those three years, Plaintiff’s claim was barred. Upon receipt of the motions, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Quick Mold Lab, Inc. a/a/o Tomasa Raffo v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo obtained a dismissal in the matter styled Quick Mold Lab, Inc. a/a/o Tomasa Raffo v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, making the argument that the assignee stands in the shoes of the assignor, that the insured/assignor had not complied with the post-loss duties imposed by the policy, and that the services provided by Plaintiff would only be covered if the costs were a result of a covered peril. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Top Mold Solutions, LLC a/a/o Tomasa Raffo v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez and Senior Associate Alec Teijelo obtained a dismissal in the matter styled Top Mold Solutions, LLC a/a/o Tomasa Raffo v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, and was therefore invalid and unenforceable; thus, Plaintiff lacked standing to file suit. On the eve of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.
Case:
Truviewmold, LLC a/a/o Sue Demmings v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice 
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Truviewmold, LLC a/a/o Sue Demmings v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered after Hurricane Irma pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that the mold testing services provided by Plaintiff would only be covered if the costs were a result of a covered peril, and that the underlying claim was not covered by the policy, as its ability to investigate the loss had been prejudiced by a failure to report the damage until two years after the hurricane. Just before the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More
 
Case:
Restoration Cleaning Services, Inc. a/a/o Miriam Muniz v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice 
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Restoration Cleaning Services, Inc. a/a/o Miriam Muniz v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered after Tropical Storm Gordon pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, based on the policy’s exclusion for damage cause by wear and tear, the lack of any evidence of a peril created opening in the roof that allowed rain water to enter the property, and the position that the tarp services provided by Plaintiff would only be covered if the costs were a result of a covered peril. Before the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case.  Read More
 
Case:
Restoration Doctor, Inc. a/a/o Miriam Muniz v. Defendant Insurance Company 
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal  
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo Esq., obtained a dismissal in the matter styled Restoration Doctor, Inc. a/a/o Miriam Muniz v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered after Tropical Storm Gordon pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, based on the policy’s exclusion for damage cause by wear and tear, the lack of any evidence of a peril created opening in the roof that allowed rain water to enter the property, and the position that the shrink-wrap services provided by Plaintiff would only be covered if the costs were a result of a covered peril. Following receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More
 
Case:
Restoration 911 Mitigation LLC a/a/o Ariel Arcia v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Behnejad Law, PLLC  
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Restoration 911 Mitigation LLC a/a/o Ariel Arcia v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to water mitigation services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Plaintiff alleged that it was entitled to proceeds under the reasonable emergency measures provision of the policy, which covers necessary measures taken to protect property from further damage. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that the services rendered by Plaintiff, 19 months after the date of loss, were not reasonable, necessary, or emergency, and therefore not covered by the policy. Following receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More
 
Case:
Beacon Management Services LLC a/a/o Ariel Arcia v. Defendant Insurance Company  
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Behnejad Law, PLLC  
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice 
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Beacon Management Services LLC a/a/o Ariel Arcia v. Defendant Insurance Company.  Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to mold remediation services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Plaintiff alleged that it was entitled to proceeds under the policy’s additional coverage for fungi, wet or dry rot, yeast, or bacteria. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that the underlying loss was excluded from coverage, and additional coverage that could relate to mold remediation only applies when the costs are the result of a covered peril. Just before the hearing on the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case.  Read More
 
Case:
JD Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Cala Paint Service, Inc. v . Defendant Insurance Company  
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Weisser Elazar & Kantor, PLLC
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice 
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled JD Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Cala Paint Service, Inc. v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to tarp services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Plaintiff alleged that it was entitled to proceeds under the reasonable emergency measures provision of the policy, which covers necessary measures taken to protect property from further damage. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that the services rendered by Plaintiff, 20 months after the date of loss, were not reasonable, necessary, or emergency, and therefore not covered by the policy. In advance of the hearing the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More
 
Case:
Dri-Max Restoration, LLC a/a/o Sue Demmings v. Defendant Insurance Company    
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney, PLLC  
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Dri-Max Restoration, LLC a/a/o Sue Demmings v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits executed more than 3 years after Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, and served its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, contending that Plaintiff’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations. Defendant relied on Florida Statute §627.70132, which requires notice of a hurricane claim be provided within 3 years of the date of loss. As Plaintiff’s purported assignment was executed outside of those 3 years, Plaintiff’s claim was barred. Upon receipt of the motions, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More
Case:
Jose Quintanilla v. Defendant Insurance Company 
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Southern Law Group
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Jose Quintanilla v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from a plumbing leak. After obtaining several Court Orders with which Plaintiff failed to comply, Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss. On the eve of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case.  Read more
Case:
Dolphin Water Restoration Corp. a/a/o Nelson Cabrera v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Watson et Barnard, PLLC 
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal in the matter styled Dolphin Water Restoration Corp. a/a/o Nelson Cabrera v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, challenging the validity of the purported assignment, contending that it failed to comply with Florida Statute §627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus Plaintiff lacked standing to file suit. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read more
Case:
Florida Restoration Specialist, Inc. a/a/o Gilda Artaza v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Ligman Martin, P.L. 
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal in the matter styled Florida Restoration Specialist, Inc. a/a/o Gilda Artaza v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, and served its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, arguing that the insured had no remaining rights to assign to Plaintiff at the time the purported assignment was executed, as an appraisal award had been entered prior to the assignment. Upon receipt of the motions, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read more
Case:
Argos Properties LLC d/b/a Smuggler Marine v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Law Office of Howard Levine 
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:
Miami Senior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., secured a dismissal in the matter styled Argos Properties LLC d/b/a Smuggler Marine v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the commercial insurance contract by not paying all amounts due for damage to a marina resulting from Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that Plaintiff had failed to provide the requested sworn proof of loss, thus failing to comply with a condition precedent to filing suit, constituting a material breach of the policy. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read more
Case:
Ramon Fernandez v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Mena Law Firm
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Ramon Fernandez v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that Plaintiff failed to comply with his duty to provide prompt notice of the claim, and that its investigation of the claim was prejudiced by Plaintiff not reporting his claim until two years after the loss. In advance of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff dismissed the case.

Case:
Rene Su v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Moises Gross
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Rene Su v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from a roof leak. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, based on the insurance policy’s exclusion for damage caused by wear and tear, and the lack of any evidence of a peril created opening in the roof that allowed rain water to enter the property. Defendant also filed its Motion to Strike the Affidavit of Plaintiff’s Expert, arguing that the affidavit was speculative, conclusory, and legally insufficient. Just before the hearing on Defendant’s Motions, Plaintiff dismissed the case.

Case:
Virginia Baist v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Marin, Eljiak, Lopez, and Martinez, P.L.
Result:
Summary Judgment
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained summary judgment in the matter styled Virginia Baist v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for her claim for damage to her property resulting from a plumbing leak in her kitchen. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, based on the insurance policy’s exclusion for damage caused by constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff’s counsel withdrew from the case, and Plaintiff proceeded pro se. Finding an absence of evidence to support Plaintiff’s case, the Court granted Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

Case:
Sue Demmings v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Marin, Eljiak, Lopez, and Martinez, P.L.
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Sue Demmings v. Defendant Insurance Company filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for her claim for damage to her property resulting from Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, asserting the argument that Plaintiff failed to comply with her duty to provide prompt notice of the claim, and that its investigation of the claim was prejudiced by Plaintiff not reporting her claim until two years after the loss. Just before the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff dismissed the case.

Case:
Emergency Mold & Water Remediation, LLC a/a/o Betsy Fernandez & Alejandro Marquez v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Mario Serralta & Associates
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matterstyled Emergency Mold & Water Remediation, LLC a/a/o Betsy Fernandez & Alejandro Marquez v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, arguing that the purported assignment of benefits was invalid and unenforceable, as the insured had no benefits left to assign at the time it was executed, and thus Plaintiff lacked standing. On the eve of the hearing on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff dismissed the case.

Case:
Miriam Muniz v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Your Insurance Attorney
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., and Associate Alec Teijelo, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Miriam Muniz v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for her claim for damage to her property resulting from Tropical Storm Gordon. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, based on the insurance policy’s exclusion for damage caused by wear and tear, and the lack of any evidence of a peril created opening in the roof that allowed rain water to enter the property. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case.

Case:
South Florida Restoration Service a/a/o Kendale Woods North Condominium Association v. Defendant Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Hernandez Legal Group
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled South Florida Restoration Service a/a/o Kendale Woods North Condominium Association v. Defendant Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to more than $140,000 in services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion to Dismiss, and served Plaintiff with its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, arguing that the purported assignment failed to comply with Florida Statute Section 627.7152, was therefore invalid and unenforceable, and thus Plaintiff lacked standing to file suit. Upon receipt of the motions, Plaintiff dismissed the case.

Case:
Diana Carrasco Landauer v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Silverberg Brito
Result:
Partial Summary Judgment/Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained partial summary judgment followed by a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Diana Carrasco Landauer v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for her claim for damage to her property resulting from a balcony/window leak. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that the interior damage caused by rain was not covered by the policy as there was no evidence that the rain water entered the property through a peril created opening. In response to the motion, despite Plaintiff having testified that the claimed damage was the result of rain water entering her property, Plaintiff attempted to change the cause of loss from a balcony/window leak to a plumbing leak, filing an affidavit signed by a supposed expert in support of this new theory. Mr. Perez then secured partial summary judgment in favor of Defendant, as to any damages claimed by Plaintiff resulting from rain, and sought the deposition of Plaintiff’s supposed expert, seeking the basis for the opinion asserted in his affidavit. Just before that deposition, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
Water Dryout, LLC a/a/o James Battaglia v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
David Low & Associates
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Water Dryout, LLC a/a/o James Battaglia v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, and its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, arguing that Plaintiff lacked standing, as the purported assignment was invalid, and a misrepresentation.

Defendant’s motions were based on an affidavit executed by the insured, attesting to the fact that the signature on the purported assignment was not his, that he did not sign any contract with the Plaintiff, and that he did not even hire the Plaintiff to perform any services at his property. Just before the hearing on Defendant’s motions, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
General Contractors of Central Florida a/a/o Nelfrad Similien v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
PZ Law Firm
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled General Contractors of Central Florida a/a/o Nelfrad Similien v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Following the deposition of the insured, during which Mr. Perez secured favorable testimony in support of Defendant’s position that the damage at issue was the result of constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
General Contractors of Central Florida a/a/o Nelfrad Similien v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Militzok & Levy
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled National Water Restoration a/a/o Elizabeth Phillip and Andre Vulcain v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Following the deposition of the insured, during which Mr. Perez secured favorable testimony in support of Defendant’s position that the damage at issue was the result of faulty, inadequate or defective workmanship and repair, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
911 Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Cutler Venture, LLC v. Citizens Property Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Mineo Salcedo Law Firm
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal in the matter styled 911 Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Cutler Venture, LLC v. Citizens Property Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant served Plaintiff with its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, arguing that the loss, an alleged plumbing leak, was not a covered cause of loss specifically enumerated in the named perils insurance policy, and thus Plaintiff’s claim was frivolous in nature. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
Emergency Remediation Services, LLC a/a/o Luis Mesa v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Trujillo Vargas Gonzalez Hevia
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Emergency Remediation Services, LLC a/a/o Luis Mesa v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, presenting the argument that Plaintiff failed to provide notice of its purported assignment prior to filing suit, that Defendant’s contractual obligations are not triggered until the moment notice of the assignment is provided, and that it could not be said that Defendant had denied a valid claim which could have given rise to a breach of contract action. On the eve of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
William Guy v. Tower Hill Select Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Morgan & Morgan
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled William Guy v. Tower Hill Select Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from Hurricane Irma. Defendant served Plaintiff with its Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Florida Statute §57.105, arguing that the loss was expressly excluded by a policy endorsement, and thus Plaintiff’s claim was frivolous in nature. Upon receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
So. Fla. Water Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Francisco Paris v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Silverberg Brito
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled So. Fla. Water Restoration, Inc. a/a/o Francisco Paris v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, making the argument that the insured had not complied with the post-loss duties imposed by the policy, by failing to submit to an examination under oath, and as an assignee standing in the shoes of the assignor, Plaintiff was not entitled to the recovery of any benefits under the insurance policy. Following receipt of the motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
Bernard Etienne v. Citizens Property Insurance Company
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Insurance Litigation Group
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled Bernard Etienne v. Citizens Property Insurance Company. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by not paying the full amount of damages sustained to his property from Hurricane Irma. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, maintaining the position that Plaintiff failed to comply with the insurance policy’s appraisal provision. On the eve of the hearing on Defendant’s motion, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
The Restoration Team a/a/o Yania Padilla v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Strems Law Firm
Result:
Dismissal with Prejudice
Summary:

Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal with prejudice in the matter styled The Restoration Team a/a/o Yania Padilla v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for Plaintiff’s claim for payment relating to services rendered at the insured property pursuant to an assignment of benefits. Defendant filed its Motion for Summary Judgment, making the argument that the services rendered by Plaintiff, which were performed 17 months after the date of loss, did not constitute necessary emergency measures, and were therefore not covered under the insurance policy. Following receipt of the motion, and just before the deposition of its corporate representative, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
Besner Sanon v Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Plaintiff Counsel:
Litigation & Recovery Law Center
Result:
Dismissal
Summary:

Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained a dismissal in the matter styled Besner Sanon v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant breached the insurance contract by denying coverage for his claim for damage to his property resulting from a plumbing leak in the kitchen. Defendant maintained its position that the loss was excluded from coverage pursuant to the insurance policy’s provision pertaining to damage caused by constant or repeated seepage or leakage of water, and the applicable anti-concurrent cause provision. On the eve of trial, Plaintiff dismissed the case. Read More.

Case:
John and Suzanne Akucewicz v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Summary Judgment
Summary:
Miami Junior Partner Anthony Perez, Esq., obtained summary judgment in the matter styled John and Suzanne Akucewicz v. Citizens Property Insurance Corporation. The Plaintiff filed suit claiming damage to their property from a sudden and accidental discharge of water from within a plumbing system. Mr. Perez argued that there was no evidence of any damage to the property resulting from the reported plumbing discharge, and to the extent there could have been any damage, our client was entitled to a presumption of prejudice which the Plaintiff failed to rebut. The Court agreed, finding a lack of evidence to support Plaintiffs’ claim, and a presumption of prejudice that Plaintiffs failed to overcome. Read more