Skip to main content

verdicts


Trial Verdicts and Results

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Defense Verdict
Summary:

Jack Luks, Partner and Carl Christy, Associate received a defense verdict September 18, 2007 on a Slip & Fall incident. Plaintiff while visiting Defendant's movie theater on August 1, 2003, proceeded to the restroom and alleged that she slipped and fell while descending a ramp within the auditorium.  The Plaintiff further contended that there was a greasy, slippery substance on the floor in the seating area that transferred to the soles of her shoes.  Additionally, she  contended that the lighting was inadequate and the subject ramp violated the Florida Building Code.  Plaintiff had herniated disc at L4-5 and L5-S1 resulting in a double fusion, right knee surgery and right shoulder dislocation.  Plaintiff incurred $63K in medical expenses and claimed $370K in lost pension benefits, earnings and earning capacity. Plaintiff asked the jury for $633K ($433K for medicals and lost wages/loss of earning capacity). Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
RESULT
Summary:

Severe   motor   vehicle  accident   involving  a   T-bone collision. Defendant did not see Plaintiff approaching and turned in front of Plaintiffs vehicle. Defendant contended that Plaintiffs approaching vehicle was not visible due to a small bridge 200 feet from  the  point  of the collision. Plaintiffs vehicle was totaled . Defendant also contended that Plaintiff must have been speeding. Plaintiffs treating physician Dr. Andrew Schmer, D.C., opined that Plaintiff had  an  8%  permanent   impairment   rating.  Plaintiffs treating orthopedic physician , Dr. Pedro Berman , M.D., opined that  Plaintiff  had a 3% permanent  impairment based  upon Plaintiffs  own  "subjective " complaints. Plaintiffs  medical  bills  totaled  approx.  $15K.  Plaintiff requested  $44K for past  and future medical  care  and $69,350 for future  pain and  suffering. Defendant's expert, Dr. Salvador Ramirez, a board certified orthopedic surgeon, testified that Plaintiff had no objective findings to substantiate his subjective complaints and that all problems pre-dated the accident. Dr. Ramirez testified that Plaintiff did not suffer a permanent injury. Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Result:
Summary Judgment
Summary:
James Waczewski (Tallahassee) and Thomas Farrell (Orlando) were granted a Motion for Summary Judgment September 7, 2007 when the judge found that Disney, as a landlord, was not vicariously liable for the alleged negligence of its tenant, Palmas Inc. Walt Disney World is the owner of the property and the landlord to the restaurant operated by Palmas Inc.  An entire family of four sued Walt Disney World alleging that the whole family was made sick from contaminated food at a restaurant on Disney property.  The Plaintiffs claim that the illness further caused a family member's prior gastric surgery to be torn resulting in permanent complications with digestion. The Plaintiffs demanded more than $1M.  James P. Waczewski, Tallahassee Managing Attorney prepared a motion for summary judgment on behalf of Walt Disney World arguing that Disney's involvement is too attenuated to hold the company legally responsible for the Plaintiff's injuries.  Thomas Walker Farrell, Associate argued the motion and convinced the judge that the terms of the lease agreement included an indemnity clause which evidenced Disney's relationship with the restaurant as merely a landlord and not an entity taking responsibility for the day to day operations of the restaurant. Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Partial Summary Judgment
Summary:

Anthony J. Petrillo, Tampa Managing Partner and Jason D. Montes, Associate prepared and argued a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on August 20, 2007 in a multi-million dollar wrongful death case. The case involved a heavy impact front collision when Defendant crossed the centerline resulting in the death of a 24 year old mother of an infant.  In the pretrial phase, Defense obtained summary judgment on the husband survivor's claim due to a defect in the hospital bed marriage ceremony.  At trial, Plaintiff sought $15M in non-economics and $1.5M in economics.  Defense contended Plaintiff failed to wear her seatbelt and proved her severed suprahepatic vena cava was directly caused by trauma to her liver due to her failure to buckle up.  The jury found Plaintiff 43% comparative fault and reduced to a net verdict of $1.4M. Read more

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Favorable Verdict
Summary:
Anthony J. Petrillo, Tampa Managing Partner and Jason Montes, Associate received good results when Jury found no permanency on a severe motor vehicle accident awarding Plaintiff past medicals only for a net verdict of $11,260.00 after PIP setoffs.   The case was tried solely on causation and damages. Plaintiff incurred approx. $21K in past medical bills alleging aggravation of a pre-existing neck injury (disc herniations) and a new back injury (activation of symptoms from a dormant/asymptomatic lumbar herniation).   Plaintiff’s treating doctors and Neurologist testified Plaintiff had permanent injury and assigned 23% permanent impairment rating.  Plaintiff asked the jury for past medicals of $21K, future medicals between $60K - $90K and pain & suffering damages between $300K  - $600K. Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Directed verdict in favor of Defendant
Summary:
On December 2, 2002, at the intersection of NE 123rd Street and N. Bayshore Drive in North Miami, Defendant allegedly veered off the road and struck Plaintiff, a pedestrian. Plaintiff claimed that Defendant was not paying attention; he dropped something in his vehicle, reached to retrieve it, and his vehicle went off the road into a guard rail subsequently hitting Plaintiff who had pulled his truck over and gotten out of it. Defendant admitted liability, but alleged that the accident was not the legal cause of loss, injury, or damage to Plaintiff. Defendant further alleged that Plaintiff jumped over the railing, causing his injuries. The case was tried on damages only. Plaintiff requested payment for past pain and suffering, past lost wages, future medical expenses, and future pain and suffering. The court entered a directed verdict in favor of Defendant regarding loss of future earning capacity. Plaintiff requested a total award of $ 30,000, including $ 7,000 in past medical expenses and $ 616 in lost wages. Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
Result:

The jury found that Woodlawn failed to perform its duty under the contract in failing to bury the organs with the body, and awarded Rivera $3,000. The jury found in favor of the Defendants on all of the other counts.

Summary:

Orestes Perez and Allison Marshall obtained a win in a Negligence & Breach of Contract case in Miami-Dade County. Plaintiff’s husband died in a car accident in Lake City, Florida. His body was subsequently brought to the Duval County Medical Examiners where an autopsy was performed. In accordance with standard practice, the decedent's internal organs were placed in a heavy red plastic bag conspicuously marked "BIO HAZARD." After the funeral had taken place, Rivera unknowingly received a white bag containing the organs under the presumption they were the effects of her husband. Rivera sued Halloway Funeral Home, Inc., American Memorial Centers, Inc., Woodlawn Park Cemetery Company and Premier Funeral Services & Cremations, Inc., claiming they had negligently and carelessly failed to discharge their duties. She additionally sued claiming, breach of contract, Violation of Chapter 470 and Chapter 497 of Florida Statutes, Tortuous Interference with a dead body, Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress, and Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.  More Now

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Defense Verdict
Summary:

Daniel J. Santaniello, Managing Partner and William J. Peterfriend, Associate received a win for a slip and fall incident April 27, 2007.  Plaintiff alleged Defendants failed to properly maintain and inspect the stairs outside Plaintiff’s condominium unit, thereby allowing leaves and sap to accumulate.  Plaintiff claimed to have fallen as a result of slipping on wet leaves and sap after a rainfall the night before the morning of the incident. Plaintiff alleged that as a result of the subject accident, she fractured her left elbow. Defendant maintained that maintenance procedures were adequate and Plaintiff failed to provide any proof of leaves ever existing or accumulating on the steps, in the form of either testimony or photographs.  Plaintiff demanded $100K immediately prior to trial The Jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant finding that that there was no negligence on the part of either Defendant. Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Defense Verdict
Summary:
On October 26, 2004, Defendant Andrew allegedly failed to yield the right-of-way at the intersection of Central Industrial Drive and Prospect Avenue in Riviera Beach. Plaintiff was stopped at a stop sign and proceeded through the intersection when Andrew swerved into the opposite lane of travel, striking Plaintiff. Defendants denied liability, maintaining that Andrew had no stop sign and thus had no obligation to yield the right-of-way to Plaintiff.  Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Defense Verdict
Summary:
Plaintiff sued the Coca Cola Co. for negligence and sought $1M. Around May 4, 2001, Plaintiff, a Shoreline Transportation employed 18-wheel truck driver in his 40's, picked up multiple 1,000 pound canisters of Coca Cola syrup in Atlanta to deliver to Pompano Beach, FL. Traveling southbound on I-95, Plaintiff first stopped at his home in Hialeah, FL before making the trip back north to Pompano Beach. Near the I-95, Copans Road exit, Plaintiff got a flat tire. As he brought the truck to a stop, the syrup canisters came crashing through the front of the trailer and into the cabin. Plaintiff alleged to have suffered herniated disc at L4-5, which required two surgeries. Plaintiff initially filed a $26K wage loss claim, the result of 13 months he claimed he could not work. Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Favorable Result
Summary:

The Plaintiff sued CSX Transportation pursuant to the Federal Employers Liability Act (F.E.L.A.) for failing to provide a safe place to work. Paul Jones and Todd Springer obtained good results when the jury found Plaintiff 70% comparatively negligent for his injuries resulting in a total award of only $3,600 (i.e., $12,000 awarded). On September 4, 1999, the Plaintiff mounted a van at Baldwin Yard to be taken to the Yard office after finishing his shift as a brakeman. The Plaintiff alleged that before he was seated in the rear of the van and before he was able to put on his seatbelt, the driver of the van drove away at an excessive speed hitting a pothole in the dirt road causing him to strike his head against the roof of the van. Plaintiff testified that he immediately felt pain in his neck and reported the injury to his supervisor at CSX.  Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Defense Verdict
Summary:

Daniel Santaniello and William Peterfriend obtained a defense verdict on March 7, 2007 for a vehicular liability case when the Jury found that the Defendant Ms. Naso was not the legal cause of loss, injury or damage to the Plaintiff. Plaintiff filed suit alleging that on September 29, 2003 the Defendant violated a stop sign on Commerce Parkway. Defendant admitted liability, but alleged that the accident was not the legal cause of loss, injury or damage to Plaintiff. Plaintiff claimed that as a result of the subject accident, she sustained permanent injuries to her lower back. Plaintiff also alleged to have suffered injuries to her neck, left arm, left knee and left thigh. Plaintiff maintained that the injury in her back was permanent and left her unable to enjoy life and severely limited her future earning capacity as a Chemist. Plaintiff was first treated in the Emergency Room which documented an injury to the back and left knee, with severe bruising and evidence of trauma.

Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Defense Verdict
Summary:

Daniel Santaniello and Marc Greenberg obtained a defense verdict for a vehicular liability case on February 15, 2007 when the Jury found that the Defendant was not the legal cause of loss, injury or damage to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff, a thirty (30) year old Accountant, filed suit alleging that on April 30, 2001 the Defendant, Miguel Hidalgo, rear ended her at a moderate rate of speed on Okeechobee Blvd. in West Palm Beach. The Defendant admitted liability, but alleged that the moderate-impact accident was not the legal cause of loss, injury or damage to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff maintained that the injury to her neck was permanent, and left her unable to enjoy life, effecting her ability to engage in physical activities, and maintain relationships with co-workers, friends, and family. Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Result:
Favorable Verdict
Summary:
SUMMARY. Read More
Case:
Leff v. Ecker
Practice Area:
PRACTICE AREA
Attorney(s):
Result:
(Appeal, 2007) Evidentiary Hearing
Summary:
SUMMARY. Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
PRACTICE AREA
Attorney(s):
Result:
Favorable Verdict
Summary:

Paul Jones, Partner and William Peterfriend, Esq. received a major win for a vehicular liability in Broward County. The Jury awarded $0 for total amount of damages for reasonable and necessary medical expenses sustained by Plaintiff. The jury answered No to the issue of permanency. The Plaintiff filed suit alleging that on January 25, 2004, Defendant violated a red light signal when exiting the Florida Turnpike onto Red Road. Defendant contended at trial Plaintiff violated the red light. Defendant further contended that Plaintiff was driving with alcohol on his breath after partying on South Beach the night prior to the accident. Plaintiff claimed that as a result of the subject accident, he sustained permanent scarring and permanent injuries to his neck. Plaintiff’s treating physician Dr. Alex Cintron, D.C., testified that Plaintiff had a 5% impairment rating. Defendant’s expert, Dr. Christopher Troiano testified that Plaintiff showed no signs of objective injury.  Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Favorable Verdict
Summary:

Daniel Santaniello, Anthony Petrillo and Paul Jones, the defense team for Florida Pool Products, received a major win on November 2, 2006 for a one month product liability trial in Pinellas County. Wal-Mart and Florida Pool Products, Inc. were co-defendants in the trial of a 3 year old boy who was rectally impaled resulting in a colostomy on a dive stick that had been recalled by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Plaintiff asked the jury for $15 million in compensatory damages and further sought punitive damages in the amount of $32-40 million. The Jury found the family and others 85% at fault, resulting in a net verdict of $10,200 against our client and punitive damages of $120,000, well below a 7 figure Offer of Judgment.   Read More

Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Favorable Verdict
Summary:
The Plaintiff, an employee of Automated Plastics Group Industry, was operating an extruder machine when his arm was drawn into rollers associated with the machine’s take off unit. The Plaintiff asked the Jury for $3.7M ($678,000 in specials; $3M in pain and suffering). The jury found Plaintiff 75% comparative negligence. The Defendant was entitled to a $1.12M set-off for a prior settlement and therefore the Plaintiff took nothing in this action. Read More
Case:
Preziosi v. La Paloma Group
Practice Area:
Result:
Cause of Action Dismissed
Summary:
SUMMARY. Read More
Case:
Practice Area:
Attorney(s):
Result:
Favorable Verdict
Summary:
Defense admitted liability, the case was tried solely on the issues of causation and damages. Plaintiff alleged that she was rear-ended from an impact which totaled the Defendant’s vehicle. Plaintiff sustained left shoulder sprain/strain, neck sprain strain, low back with possible annular tear and bulges at L4-L5 and L5- S1 for which a dicogram and nucleoplasty surgery had been recommended. The jury determined that the negligence of the Defendant was the legal cause of injury, loss or damage to the Plaintiff and that Jose Rivera was not entitled to any recovery for the filial consortium claim or for the loss of services for his daughter. The verdict awarded Plaintiffs a net of $6K. The Plaintiff asked the jury for her medical bills ($22K) and future medical expenses, future loss of earning capacity, pain and suffering in the past and future, and loss of support and services for the father. The jury awarded the Plaintiff less than her medical bills (i.e., only $16K). The jury also determined that the Plaintiff was not entitled to any future medical bills, had not sustained a permanent injury. The Jury awarded the Defendant the $10,000 setoff for the payable PIP benefits at trial. Read More